|
A
sermon for the Consecration of George Edward Councell as
Bishop XI of the Diocese of New Jersey, by the Reverend
Alan M. Gates
Download
the sermon (PDF, 112 KB)
When
one steps into a new role, it is a salutary exercise to consider
how others in the past have carried out that role. An aspiring
composer might look to the life and work of Beethoven or Stravinsky.
A new mayor might find out just what Fiorello LaGuardia did
to get an airport named after himself.
A task
today, then, might be to come up with a bishop who could serve
as the archetype for a newly minted successor. To whom might
the Reverend Mr. Councell look for example and inspiration?
Because
for many years your new bishop had the habit of dressing
up as Saint Nicholas, the Bishop of Myra, it occurs to
me to wonder whether Nicholas might not be the appropriate
episcopal role model. We are told that the 4th-century
Nicholas was a pious man. In fact, the hagiography reports
as follows: Directly [after Nicholas] was born he was put
in a basin to be washed, but, to the astonishment of the
nurses, he stood up in the basin, and remained for two
hours in ecstasy, his hands clasped, and his eyes raised
to heaven.1
Uncommon
piety – that’s good! Of course we know that Nicholas
was generous. His legendary provision of bags of gold as dowry
for three poor sisters probably helped turn St. Nicholas into
Santa Claus. Generosity and pastoral attention – very
good.
But
now here’s a story about Bishop Nicholas which isn’t
spread around much. It seems that Nicholas was present for
the Council of Nicaea, at which the Arian heresy was being
debated. Some of the partisans of Arius had set his teachings
to music, and were singing their heretical little ditty, presumably
to make their points more easily remembered. According to the
tale,
the
bishops, on hearing the song, raised their hands in horror,
and … wishing to express their disgust at blasphemous
words, kept their ears fast closed, and their eyes fast
shut. [At] this point [in a] sudden outbreak of fury, Nicholas,
bishop of Myra, [dealt] a blow with all his force at Arius’s
jaw.2
Now,
we don’t need a bishop with this kind of temper. Frankly,
in the wake of last Saturday’s fracas at Fenway Park,
we don’t want a model bishop who’ll put us in mind
of Don Zimmer and Pedro Martinez. Let’s keep looking.
If we
aimed for someone a little more recent, let’s say a bishop
in our own Anglican tradition, perhaps we would come up with
Samuel Wilberforce, 19th century Bishop of Oxford. He was a
learned man, that’s good. Samuel was the son of William
Wilberforce, a key player in the abolition of slavery in Britain.
A family heritage of social justice – here’s a
very strong credential. The drawback with Wilberforce, as can
happen with quick-witted people, is that he didn’t always
know how to use his sharp wit. Here’s one report: A cleric
had introduced Gregorian chants into his church. Bishop Wilberforce
found the choir lacking in its ability to pull off the challenge
of such music.
After
a prolonged and dreary dose of Gregorians, he ventured
to suggest to the rector that perhaps they were a little
unsuited to a country choir. The rector prided himself
on the music, and said, ‘David sang his psalms to
Gregorian melodies.’ [To which the bishop replied,] ‘Then
I don’t wonder Saul cast his javelin at him.’3
Clever,
but a little too frank. We don’t need a sarcastic bishop,
or one whose eloquence is tactless.
Indeed,
I am prepared after just two attempts to abandon the search
for the perfect model bishop. Prepared simply to acknowledge
that every bishop who ever was, and every bishop who ever will
be, is bound to be both saint and sinner. Ancient or modern,
black or white, male or female, our bishops will be no better
than the best of us. And why would they be otherwise? Are they
not “successors to the Apostles?” Is it not part
of our claim to catholicity that our bishops are in direct
lineage from The Twelve? And if so, why would they not share
some of the qualities of those apostles: devoted, but also
impetuous, like Peter; hard-working, but also competitive,
like James and John; honest, but also a tad incredulous, like
Thomas. By the laying-on-of hands at Ordination, our bishops
truly are in Apostolic Succession – just as great, and
just as human, as those apostles.
The
apostles (and all the saints) are examples for us in our own
spiritual journeys not for their perfection, but for their
faith, for their devotion to our Lord. So it is with our bishops.
One of those bishops in our own day, has put it succinctly:
We are not called to success; we are called to faithfulness.4
Perhaps,
then, we do not have a model for the “perfect” bishop.
But we do have a mandate for the “faithful” bishop.
That mandate comes to us through Scripture and tradition. Let’s
look.
The
role of bishops in the church of the New Testament was only
just emerging. The episkopoi, the overseers, are mentioned
only a few times. The Letter of Paul to Titus [1:7-9] suggests
that a bishop, as God’s steward, must be blameless;
must not be arrogant or quick-tempered or addicted to wine
or violent or greedy for gain. On the contrary, the bishop
must be hospitable, a lover of goodness, prudent, upright,
devout, and self-controlled.
In those
fledgling years of the church, the epistles are more likely
to dwell on the characteristics of a bishop than the bishop’s
function. For that function, we turn to the Prayer Book. Throughout
this Consecration liturgy, the language of the Examination
and the prayers defines the ministry which we gather to celebrate.
They suggest that your bishop has three primary roles, each
in Spirit-filled tension with the other. The bishop is Prophet,
Priest, and Shepherd. To put it another way, the bishop’s
concerns are Justice, Reconciliation, and Compassion. Allow
me to dwell for a moment on each.
First,
Justice. In a moment the Bishop-elect will be enjoined “boldly
[to] proclaim and interpret the Gospel of Christ, enlightening
the minds and stirring up the conscience of [his] people.” [BCP,
p. 518]
The
biblical role of prophet resides in many places in our church,
and in our society. Wherever the insistent voice of justice
calls us to account, there the prophet speaks. Many such voices
are outside of established leadership. But insofar as bishops
are our chief teachers, and insofar as they occupy the “bully
pulpits” of our communion, and insofar as proclamation
is a central Gospel task, a bishop cannot shun the prophetic
role. Even those bishops who see themselves as primarily “pastoral” bishops,
cannot leave the matter of justice to others.
Franciscan
writer Richard Rohr describes the sort of justice the church
is after, as distinct from the justice which is the concern
of the gold-domed statehouse just down the block.
Our
goal is restorative justice, while the best the
(legal) system can do is retributive justice.
The law cannot ever promise God’s restorative justice,
much less offer true transformation. We have something
much better to give, and we had better not lose it … or
we have lost everything Jesus taught us.5
In other
words, the justice a bishop proclaims is not just what is “fair,” but
indeed what is visionary: what looks like the reign of Christ.
When Jesus preached, as in our Gospel lesson today [Luke 4:14-21],
what was the content of that preaching? It was “to bring
good news to the poor … to proclaim release to the captives.” Your
bishop must never forget the role of prophet, never overlook
the call of justice, never stop holding Christ’s restorative
images of the Kingdom up before your eyes, and those of your
communities. And you and I must be open to that prophetic voice.
The
bishop’s second task is Reconciliation. In a moment the
Presiding Bishop will charge the new bishop to “exercise
without reproach the high priesthood to which [he has been]
called.” [BCP, p. 521] And what is the priesthood but
the ministry of reconciliation? It is the bridging of estranged
relationships – human and divine; human and human. And
what is reconciliation but healing?
Here
in New Jersey you have said that you seek in your new bishop
a healer, and you have called just such a one. I assume that
it was either fully intentional or fully providential that
this consecration was set for the Feast of St. Luke, the Beloved
Physician. “From God health spreads over all the earth,” proclaimed
our first Lesson [Ecclesiasticus 38:1-4, 6-10, 12-14] and we
pray for just such health. Again I quote from Richard Rohr:
Our
Christian goal must be the healing and reconciliation of
the individual and, by implication, of the society. Mercy,
patience, forgiveness, absolute trust in the possibility
of growth and transformation, and God’s power to
save are our specialties, our primary products…. 6
Healing
and reconciliation require mercy, forgiveness, and patience.
Your bishop must never forget this priestly role, never fail
to be an agent of healing in your midst. And you and I must
be co-agents of that reconciliation.
The
bishop’s third task is Compassion. “Tend the flock
of Christ,” the Presiding Bishop will charge. “As
[chief pastor], encourage and support all baptized people in
their gifts and ministries.” This is the role of Shepherd.
Let
me tell you a true story. A certain young Canon to the Ordinary
was much loved by his Diocese, much in demand for preaching
and visiting in the parishes. When Christmas Eve rolled around,
his presence would have been welcomed at the Cathedral, or
at any of the cardinal parishes of the Diocese. Cutting a sharp
figure in his purple cassock, he would have added luster to
the liturgical pomp of Christmas Eve in a place with processions
and fanfare. But it was to none of these places that the young
Canon went. Year after year, in the still darkness of late
evening, he would toss his vestments into the Toyota, and make
the hour-long drive through the valleys to a tiny, struggling
church that had no priest. There, in that forgotten mill town,
he would bring the message to a few dozen worshippers that
they were not forgotten. The Christmas message, the Incarnation
of God’s love in quiet, humble places – this was
made real to them by one with a pastor’s heart, a young
canon who is now your new bishop. Perhaps they sang together
the words of Phillips Brooks:
where
charity stands watching and faith holds wide the door,
the dark night wakes, the glory breaks, and Christmas comes
once more. [Hymn 79]
Charity
and faith. These are the tools of the bishop in the role of
Shepherd, in the ministry of compassion. You have called a
bishop with the heart of a pastor. Join with him in pastoring
one another.
George,
my colleague, mentor, and brother in Christ: please stand up.
In the
Library of St. John’s Church, Northampton, Massachusetts,
a place well-known to you, there used to hang a curious artistic
rendition of the Good Shepherd. It had that Victorian, sentimental
style about it. In the picture, the shepherd is standing at
the edge of a rocky ledge, reaching down precariously with
one hand towards a little lamb who has strayed into danger.
The shepherd is balancing himself with the other hand, which
is holding a shepherd’s crook. And that’s the peculiar
thing. Why isn’t the shepherd using the crook? If it
were just a walking stick, it wouldn’t have that curved
end. The crook is purposely designed to snag wayward sheep
and keep them safe. Apparently the Good Shepherd of the Rocks
has lost the owner’s manual for his crook and doesn’t
know how to use it! What the heck?! He’s got a perfectly
good tool, which he is failing to use.
George,
this is the moment in the liturgy known as The Charge, and
here is my charge to you.
First:
Let the Good Shepherd of the Rocks be to you a cautionary image.
Do not neglect to use the tools of your office. As bishop you
will be vested with administrative authority, given a pulpit
(164, actually!) for moral suasion, and empowered to administer
the highest sacraments of our tradition. Never fail to use
the tools of power entrusted to you. Use them for justice,
reconciliation, and compassion.
Second:
Be faithful in prayer, as we know you to be. Be faithful also
in sabbath, as we know you want to be. The prayer of Consecration
says that you are to “serve day and night” in this
ministry. Do not take that phrase too literally! The flame-shaped
thing they are about to put on your head is meant to symbolize
the flame of the Holy Spirit, not the flame of burn-out. You
must not allow the weight of administrative and liturgical
duties to crush the life out of your pastoral heart.
Neither
may you forget that, long before you took your ordination vows,
you took another vow, and that vow has a beautiful face, and
that vow has a name: Ruth. Apostolic Succession is an awesome
gift – but that apostolic genealogy is not more important
than the other family tree from which you draw the lifeblood
of love. Be faithful in your prayer, and in your Sabbath.
Finally:
Take your cue from the wonderful final paragraph of the profile
which this Diocese drew up a year ago. “The brave heart
that is not discouraged, the hopeful heart that makes the best
of all things: this is the heart needed in our next bishop.” George,
by the grace of God, be that brave heart which is not discouraged,
that hopeful heart which makes the best of all things.
Last
of all, another Charge. A charge to the people of this Diocese.
Garrison
Keillor once said, “Most couples deserve each other.” This
is not a marriage, but it is a covenanted relationship, and
I believe that you want to deserve each other. Your new bishop
must live up to the trust you bestow upon him this day. So
also you must be the Diocese that mirrors the bishop for whom
you yearn.
You
have asked for a bishop who is “a person of prayer, who
lives the faith.” Pray with him, live that faith with
him.
You
have asked for a bishop who is “honorable, open, honest,
and transparent in his dealings with the world.” Be honorable
and open with him.
You
have asked for a “peacemaker and spiritual diplomat as
[you] continue to heal from the difficult times.” Engage
in that peacemaking yourselves, ready for all the give and
take required in any diplomacy, spiritual or otherwise.
Love
one another, as Christ loves you. May this diocese and its
bishop grow to mirror one another in trust and love. In so
doing, by the grace of God, may you mirror the One whose name
you proclaim.
This
is our prayer; in Jesus’ name. Amen.
________________________
1 S.
Baring-Gould, The Lives of the Saints (London: Chiswick
Press, 1877), p. 64.
2 ibid.,
p. 66.
3 Raymond
Chapman, ed., Godly and Righteous, Peevish and Perverse:
Clergy and Religious in Literature and Letters (Grand Rapids,
MI: Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2002), pp. 192-193.
4 The
Rt. Rev. Barbara Harris, oft spoken.
5 Richard
Rohr, OFM, Beyond Crime and Punishment, in Sojourners,
July/August 2002. (cited from online article 020711)
6 Rohr,
ibid
|